BALMIKI SINGH vs THE STATE OF BIHAR Advocate - Sri Uday Narayan Sinha — 142/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 419,420,34. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

ANTICIPATORY BAIL

CNR: BRSP010012812026

Filing Number

1222/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

142/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Sheikhpura

Judge

24-District and Additional Sessions Judge II

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

282

Police Station

COMPLAINT

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 419,420,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BALMIKI SINGH

    Adv. LALU KUMAR YADAV

  2. 2.RAJEEV KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR Advocate - Sri Uday Narayan Sinha

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Copy of Bail OrderView PDF

    Court Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge II, Sheikhpura rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Balmiki Singh and Rajeev Kumar in a fraud and forgery case (IPC Sections 419, 420/34). The court found that despite being served summons, the accused petitioners deliberately avoided court proceedings by failing to appear even after bailable and non-bailable warrants were issued and processes under CrPC Section 82 were invoked, demonstrating willful evasion of judicial authority. Given this contumacious conduct, the court deemed it improper to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Sessions Judge II

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge II

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge II

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 142/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge II, Sheikhpura rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Balmiki Singh and Rajeev Kumar in a fraud and forgery case (IPC Sections 419, 420/34). The court found that despite being served summons, the accused petitioners deliberately avoided court proceedings by failing to appear even after bailable and non-bailable warrants were issued and processes under CrPC Section 82 were invoked, demonstrating willful evasion of judicial authority. Given this contumacious conduct, the court deemed it improper to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case