SONAL KUMARI vs THE STATE OF BIHAR Advocate - Sri Uday Narayan Sinha — 277/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 319(2),318(4),338,336(3),340(2),112(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 02nd April 2026.

REGULAR BAIL.

CNR: BRSP010012802026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1221/2026

Filing Date

09-03-2026

Registration No

277/2026

Registration Date

09-03-2026

Court

DJ Div. Sheikhpura

Judge

2-District and Additional Sessions Judge I (Special Judge SC/ST Cases)

Decision Date

02nd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

14

Police Station

SHEIKHPURA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 319(2),318(4),338,336(3),340(2),112(2),3(5)
Conduct of Examination Act (Bihar) Section 10

Petitioner(s)

SONAL KUMARI

Adv. ANAND MOHAN

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF BIHAR Advocate - Sri Uday Narayan Sinha

Hearing History

Judge: 2-District and Additional Sessions Judge I (Special Judge SC/ST Cases)

02-04-2026

Disposed

26-03-2026

ORDER

24-03-2026

ORDER

18-03-2026

HEARING

12-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

02-04-2026
Copy of Bail Order

Summary The court rejected Sonal Kumari's bail petition in a Sub-Inspector Police examination impersonation case. The court found prima facie evidence against her, including seized admit cards and Aadhar documents of the actual candidate, and noted that a co-accused confessed to being sent to impersonate by the petitioner. Given the gravity of the offense, ongoing investigation stage, and risk of evidence tampering, bail was denied, though the petitioner may renew her prayer after charge-sheet filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court rejected Sonal Kumari's bail petition in a Sub-Inspector Police examination impersonation case. The court found prima facie evidence against her, including seized admit cards and Aadhar documents of the actual candidate, and noted that a co-accused confessed to being sent to impersonate by the petitioner. Given the gravity of the offense, ongoing investigation stage, and risk of evidence tampering, bail was denied, though the petitioner may renew her prayer after charge-sheet filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DJ Div. Sheikhpura All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case