MAHENDRA MANJHI vs THE STATE OF BIHAR Advocate - SPP — 275/2026

Case under The Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act 2022 Section 30A. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

REGULAR BAIL.

CNR: BRSP010012782026

Filing Number

1219/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

275/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Sheikhpura

Judge

19-Exclusive Special Judge Excise Cases

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

41

Police Station

BARBIGHA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act 2022 Section 30A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHENDRA MANJHI

    Adv. Sri Himay Munir Kazmi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR Advocate - SPP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy of Bail OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The court granted bail to Mehendra Manjhi, accused under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise (Amendment) Act 2018 for alleged illegal liquor sales. The court found the accused had no prior criminal history, was in custody since February 27, 2026, and imposed bail conditions including a ₹10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount, plus an undertaking that he would not repeat such offenses and appear in court for all hearings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Exclusive Special Judge Excise Cases

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 275/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The court granted bail to Mehendra Manjhi, accused under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise (Amendment) Act 2018 for alleged illegal liquor sales. The court found the accused had no prior criminal history, was in custody since February 27, 2026, and imposed bail conditions including a ₹10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount, plus an undertaking that he would not repeat such offenses and appear in court for all hearings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case