UMESH PRASAD vs THE STATE OF BIHAR Advocate - SPP — 274/2026

Case under The Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act 2022 Section 37B. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

REGULAR BAIL.

CNR: BRSP010012772026

Filing Number

1218/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

274/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Sheikhpura

Judge

19-Exclusive Special Judge Excise Cases

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

104

Police Station

EXCISE

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act 2022 Section 37B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UMESH PRASAD

    Adv. Sri Manoj Kumar 4

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR Advocate - SPP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy of Bail OrderView PDF

    Summary The Special Excise Judge at Shekhpura granted bail to Umesh Prasad in a case under Section 37 of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise (Amendment) Act 2022. The court found that while police alleged the accused consumed alcohol during a patrol on 27.02.2026, the evidence and circumstances warranted bail considering he was a local laborer with no previous flight risk, having been in custody since 28.02.2026. The court imposed bail conditions including a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and an undertaking that he would not engage in similar conduct and appear on all hearing dates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Exclusive Special Judge Excise Cases

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 274/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Special Excise Judge at Shekhpura granted bail to Umesh Prasad in a case under Section 37 of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise (Amendment) Act 2022. The court found that while police alleged the accused consumed alcohol during a patrol on 27.02.2026, the evidence and circumstances warranted bail considering he was a local laborer with no previous flight risk, having been in custody since 28.02.2026. The court imposed bail conditions including a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and an undertaking that he would not engage in similar conduct and appear on all hearing dates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case