UMESH PRASAD vs THE STATE OF BIHAR Advocate - SPP — 274/2026
Case under The Bihar Prohibition and Excise (amendment) Act 2022 Section 37B. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.
REGULAR BAIL.
CNR: BRSP010012772026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1218/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
274/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
DJ Div. Sheikhpura
Judge
19-Exclusive Special Judge Excise Cases
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
104
Police Station
EXCISE
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
UMESH PRASAD
Adv. Sri Manoj Kumar 4
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF BIHAR Advocate - SPP
Hearing History
Judge: 19-Exclusive Special Judge Excise Cases
Disposed
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Special Excise Judge at Shekhpura granted bail to Umesh Prasad in a case under Section 37 of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise (Amendment) Act 2022. The court found that while police alleged the accused consumed alcohol during a patrol on 27.02.2026, the evidence and circumstances warranted bail considering he was a local laborer with no previous flight risk, having been in custody since 28.02.2026. The court imposed bail conditions including a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and an undertaking that he would not engage in similar conduct and appear on all hearing dates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Special Excise Judge at Shekhpura granted bail to Umesh Prasad in a case under Section 37 of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise (Amendment) Act 2022. The court found that while police alleged the accused consumed alcohol during a patrol on 27.02.2026, the evidence and circumstances warranted bail considering he was a local laborer with no previous flight risk, having been in custody since 28.02.2026. The court imposed bail conditions including a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and an undertaking that he would not engage in similar conduct and appear on all hearing dates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts