RAJA KUMAR vs THE STATE OF BIHAR Advocate - SPP — 272/2026

Case under The Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act 2022 Section 37. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

REGULAR BAIL.

CNR: BRSP010012752026

Filing Number

1216/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

272/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Sheikhpura

Judge

19-Exclusive Special Judge Excise Cases

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

14

Police Station

MISSION

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act 2022 Section 37

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJA KUMAR

    Adv. Sri Virendra Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR Advocate - SPP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Copy of Bail OrderView PDF

    The Special NDPS Court in Shekhpura, Bihar granted bail to Raja Kumar in a liquor consumption case under the Bihar Prohibition & Excise (Amendment) Act 2022. The court found that while the accused was arrested for allegedly consuming alcohol on 24-02-2026, this was his third such offense, and bail was warranted given the circumstances. The court imposed a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount and issued conditions including that the accused not engage in similar incidents, appear in court for all proceedings, and undertake not to violate court orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Exclusive Special Judge Excise Cases

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 272/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Special NDPS Court in Shekhpura, Bihar granted bail to Raja Kumar in a liquor consumption case under the Bihar Prohibition & Excise (Amendment) Act 2022. The court found that while the accused was arrested for allegedly consuming alcohol on 24-02-2026, this was his third such offense, and bail was warranted given the circumstances. The court imposed a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount and issued conditions including that the accused not engage in similar incidents, appear in court for all proceedings, and undertake not to violate court orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case