SHANKAR KUMAR ALIAS SHANKAR SINGH ALIAS SAKA vs THE STATE OF BIHAR Advocate - SPP — 271/2026

Case under The Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act 2022 Section 37. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 26th March 2026.

Case disposed

REGULAR BAIL.

CNR: BRSP010012742026

Filing Number

1215/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

271/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Sheikhpura

Judge

19-Exclusive Special Judge Excise Cases

Decision Date

26-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

40

Police Station

BARBIGHA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act 2022 Section 37

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHANKAR KUMAR ALIAS SHANKAR SINGH ALIAS SAKA

    Adv. Sri Virendra Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR Advocate - SPP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    Copy of Bail OrderView PDF

    The court granted bail to Shankar Kumar (accused of violating the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Amendment Act 2022 for consuming alcohol) on a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount and Rs. 1,000 deposit with DLSA Sheikhpura. The court found that while this was the accused's fourth offense, bail was justified given the circumstances, with conditions that he appear in court regularly and not engage in similar conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Exclusive Special Judge Excise Cases

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 271/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted bail to Shankar Kumar (accused of violating the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Amendment Act 2022 for consuming alcohol) on a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount and Rs. 1,000 deposit with DLSA Sheikhpura. The court found that while this was the accused's fourth offense, bail was justified given the circumstances, with conditions that he appear in court regularly and not engage in similar conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case