ASHOK RAVIDAS vs THE STATE OF BIHAR Advocate - Sri Uday Narayan Sinha — 141/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 96,352,3(5). Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAWN on 02nd April 2026.
ANTICIPATORY BAIL
CNR: BRSP010012722026
Filing Number
1213/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
141/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Sheikhpura
Judge
24-District and Additional Sessions Judge II
Decision Date
02-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--WITHDRAWN
Last updated 25-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
24
Police Station
CHEWADA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ASHOK RAVIDAS
Adv. Surya Mani Kumar
-
2.KANCHAN DEVI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF BIHAR Advocate - Sri Uday Narayan Sinha
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Apr-2026
Copy of Order
The District and Additional Sessions Judge at Sheikhpura allowed the withdrawal of a bail petition filed by accused Ashok Ravidas and Kanchan Devi in a case registered under sections 96, 352, and 3(5) of the BNS. The court dismissed the bail petition as withdrawn, based on the accused's advocate's submission that the chargesheet against the co-accused had not been filed after investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Additional Sessions Judge II
-
28-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge II
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge II
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge II
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge II
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 141/2026
The District and Additional Sessions Judge at Sheikhpura allowed the withdrawal of a bail petition filed by accused Ashok Ravidas and Kanchan Devi in a case registered under sections 96, 352, and 3(5) of the BNS. The court dismissed the bail petition as withdrawn, based on the accused's advocate's submission that the chargesheet against the co-accused had not been filed after investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts