VIKAS KUMAR vs THE STATE OF BIHAR Advocate - SPP — 262/2026

Case under The Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act 2022 Section 30A. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

REGULAR BAIL.

CNR: BRSP010012372026

Filing Number

1179/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

262/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Sheikhpura

Judge

19-Exclusive Special Judge Excise Cases

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

55

Police Station

SHEIKHPURA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act 2022 Section 30A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIKAS KUMAR

    Adv. LALU KUMAR YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR Advocate - SPP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of Bail OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Special Judge (Excise) at Shekhpura granted bail to Vikash Kumar (age 19) in a liquor prohibition case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise (Amendment) Act 2018. The court found that while illegal liquor was recovered during a search, the accused had no prior criminal history and posed no flight risk as a poor laborer; bail was granted on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to the condition that he appear before the court and not commit similar offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Exclusive Special Judge Excise Cases

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 262/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Special Judge (Excise) at Shekhpura granted bail to Vikash Kumar (age 19) in a liquor prohibition case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise (Amendment) Act 2018. The court found that while illegal liquor was recovered during a search, the accused had no prior criminal history and posed no flight risk as a poor laborer; bail was granted on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to the condition that he appear before the court and not commit similar offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case