RAJIV KUMAR vs THE STATE OF BIHAR Advocate - Sri Uday Narayan Sinha — 257/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 319(2),318(4),338,336(3),340(2),112(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 11th March 2026.
REGULAR BAIL.
CNR: BRSP010012232026
e-Filing Number
28-02-2026
Filing Number
1167/2026
Filing Date
28-Feb-2026
Registration No
257/2026
Registration Date
28-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Sheikhpura
Judge
2-District and Additional Sessions Judge I (Special Judge SC/ST Cases)
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 25-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
14
Police Station
SHEIKHPURA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJIV KUMAR
Adv. SHYAM KISHORE KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF BIHAR Advocate - Sri Uday Narayan Sinha
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Copy of Bail OrderView PDF
Summary The court rejected the bail petition of Rajeev Kumar, accused of organizing examination impersonation and cheating in a Sub-Inspector Police recruitment exam. The court found prima facie evidence of organized crime involving multiple conspirators, corroborated by the impersonator's disclosure, incriminating mobile evidence, and ongoing investigation, making bail unsuitable despite the petitioner's lack of criminal antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Additional Sessions Judge I (Special Judge SC/ST Cases)
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge I (Special Judge SC/ST Cases)
-
07-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge I (Special Judge SC/ST Cases)
-
02-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 257/2026
Summary The court rejected the bail petition of Rajeev Kumar, accused of organizing examination impersonation and cheating in a Sub-Inspector Police recruitment exam. The court found prima facie evidence of organized crime involving multiple conspirators, corroborated by the impersonator's disclosure, incriminating mobile evidence, and ongoing investigation, making bail unsuitable despite the petitioner's lack of criminal antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts