SANJEET KUMAR vs THE STATE OF BIHAR Advocate - Sri Uday Narayan Sinha — 255/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),319(2),336(2),336(3),340(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

REGULAR BAIL.

CNR: BRSP010012182026

Filing Number

1162/2026

Filing Date

28-Feb-2026

Registration No

255/2026

Registration Date

28-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Sheikhpura

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

Police Station

CYBER

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),319(2),336(2),336(3),340(2),3(5)

Information Technology Act Section 66C,66D

Petitioner(s)

1.SANJEET KUMAR

Adv. Sri RamChandra Yadav
2.VIBHUTI KUMAR

Respondent(s)

1.THE STATE OF BIHAR Advocate - Sri Uday Narayan Sinha

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
10-Mar-2026

Copy of Bail OrderView PDF

Summary The court rejected the bail petition of Sanjeet Kumar and Vibhuti Kumar, who were arrested for cyber fraud involving fake Facebook and Instagram accounts used to defraud people by posing as astrologers offering "Vashikaran" services and old coins. The court found substantial evidence against the accused—including five mobile phones containing fake social media accounts, WhatsApp chats discussing fraud schemes, and the accused's own confessions—establishing their direct involvement in a serious, organized cyber crime threatening public safety; consequently, the court declined to grant bail given the gravity of the offense, ongoing investigation requiring interrogation, and direct allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
10-Mar-2026

Disposed

Principal District and Sessions Judge
02-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
28-Feb-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 255/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court rejected the bail petition of Sanjeet Kumar and Vibhuti Kumar, who were arrested for cyber fraud involving fake Facebook and Instagram accounts used to defraud people by posing as astrologers offering "Vashikaran" services and old coins. The court found substantial evidence against the accused—including five mobile phones containing fake social media accounts, WhatsApp chats discussing fraud schemes, and the accused's own confessions—establishing their direct involvement in a serious, organized cyber crime threatening public safety; consequently, the court declined to grant bail given the gravity of the offense, ongoing investigation requiring interrogation, and direct allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.