RANJIT KUMAR YADAV vs THE STATE OF BIHAR Advocate - SPP — 254/2026
Case under The Bihar Prohibition and Excise (amendment) Act 2022 Section 30A,32. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th April 2026.
REGULAR BAIL.
CNR: BRSP010012172026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1161/2026
Filing Date
28-02-2026
Registration No
254/2026
Registration Date
28-02-2026
Court
DJ Div. Sheikhpura
Judge
19-Exclusive Special Judge Excise Cases
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
20
Police Station
SIRARI
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RANJIT KUMAR YADAV
Adv. Sri Ashish Kumar 2
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF BIHAR Advocate - SPP
Hearing History
Judge: 19-Exclusive Special Judge Excise Cases
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 04-04-2026 | HEARING | |
| 01-04-2026 | HEARING | |
| 28-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 10-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court granted bail to Ranjit Kumar Yadav in an excise violation case under sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise (Amendment) Act 2018. The court found that while 32.5 liters of illicit alcohol was seized, the accused has a prior criminal history but no flight risk, is economically disadvantaged, and bail is in the interest of justice. Bail was approved on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, along with conditions including regular court attendance and a pledge against future violations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court granted bail to Ranjit Kumar Yadav in an excise violation case under sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise (Amendment) Act 2018. The court found that while 32.5 liters of illicit alcohol was seized, the accused has a prior criminal history but no flight risk, is economically disadvantaged, and bail is in the interest of justice. Bail was approved on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, along with conditions including regular court attendance and a pledge against future violations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts