MANTOSH KUMAR vs THE STATE OF BIHAR Advocate - Sri Uday Narayan Sinha — 247/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 87. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

REGULAR BAIL.

CNR: BRSP010011992026

Filing Number

1146/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

247/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Sheikhpura

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

55

Police Station

SIRARI

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 87

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANTOSH KUMAR

    Adv. Sri Ajay Kumar 2

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR Advocate - Sri Uday Narayan Sinha

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of Bail Order

    Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge rejected the bail petition of Mantosh Kumar, accused of kidnapping a minor girl under Section 87 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court found sufficient material on record, including the victim's statement under Section 183 BNSS and case diary evidence, establishing that the accused lured, threatened, and intimidated the minor victim with suicide threats to take her away, demanding her jewelry and money. Given the serious nature of the allegations, the victim's minor status (born 16.10.2008), ongoing investigation, and the accused being the sole accused, the court denied bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 247/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge rejected the bail petition of Mantosh Kumar, accused of kidnapping a minor girl under Section 87 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court found sufficient material on record, including the victim's statement under Section 183 BNSS and case diary evidence, establishing that the accused lured, threatened, and intimidated the minor victim with suicide threats to take her away, demanding her jewelry and money. Given the serious nature of the allegations, the victim's minor status (born 16.10.2008), ongoing investigation, and the accused being the sole accused, the court denied bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case