PURAN KUMAR vs THE STATE OF BIHAR Advocate - Sri Uday Narayan Sinha — 125/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),118(1),352,303(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.
ANTICIPATORY BAIL
CNR: BRSP010011632026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1112/2026
Filing Date
24-02-2026
Registration No
125/2026
Registration Date
24-02-2026
Court
DJ Div. Sheikhpura
Judge
2-District and Additional Sessions Judge I (Special Judge SC/ST Cases)
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
13
Police Station
SHEKHOPUR SARAI
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PURAN KUMAR
Adv. Sri Ram chandra Prasad Singh
SANJAY MISTRY
DHRAMVEER MISTRY
KARU MISTRY
NAWAL MISTRY
PRINCE KUMAR
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF BIHAR Advocate - Sri Uday Narayan Sinha
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District and Additional Sessions Judge I (Special Judge SC/ST Cases)
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-04-2026 | HEARING | |
| 04-04-2026 | HEARING | |
| 25-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 17-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court granted anticipatory bail to all six accused (Puran Kumar, Sanjay Mistry, Dhramveer Mistry, Karu Mistry, Nawal Mistry, and Prince Kumar) in a theft and assault case. The judge found that since the chargesheet was already filed, the offenses carried sentences less than seven years, and the accused cooperated in investigation, custodial detention was unnecessary. The accused were released on bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, following Supreme Court precedents on arrest guidelines. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court granted anticipatory bail to all six accused (Puran Kumar, Sanjay Mistry, Dhramveer Mistry, Karu Mistry, Nawal Mistry, and Prince Kumar) in a theft and assault case. The judge found that since the chargesheet was already filed, the offenses carried sentences less than seven years, and the accused cooperated in investigation, custodial detention was unnecessary. The accused were released on bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, following Supreme Court precedents on arrest guidelines. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts