MOHAN KUMAR vs THE STATE OF BIHAR Advocate - Sri Uday Narayan Sinha — 80/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316(2),318(4),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.
ANTICIPATORY BAIL
CNR: BRSP010007452026
Filing Number
723/2026
Filing Date
03-Feb-2026
Registration No
80/2026
Registration Date
03-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Sheikhpura
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 22-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
114
Police Station
KORMA
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MOHAN KUMAR
Adv. DEEPAK KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF BIHAR Advocate - Sri Uday Narayan Sinha
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Copy of Bail OrderView PDF
Summary: The court granted anticipatory bail to Mohan Kumar in a fraud case involving grain merchant Sakaldev Sao, finding the case to be a civil business dispute rather than a criminal matter. The court determined there was no credible evidence linking the petitioner to the alleged fraud scheme—he was merely mentioned as occasionally accompanying the main accused, with witnesses making only vague, omnibus allegations against him and no documentary evidence of his involvement. Kumar was released on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions including regular court appearance and cooperation in investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
05-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 80/2026
Summary: The court granted anticipatory bail to Mohan Kumar in a fraud case involving grain merchant Sakaldev Sao, finding the case to be a civil business dispute rather than a criminal matter. The court determined there was no credible evidence linking the petitioner to the alleged fraud scheme—he was merely mentioned as occasionally accompanying the main accused, with witnesses making only vague, omnibus allegations against him and no documentary evidence of his involvement. Kumar was released on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions including regular court appearance and cooperation in investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts