SHOBHI KUMAR vs THE STATE OF BIHAR Advocate - Sri Uday Narayan Sinha — 72/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 319(2),318(4),338,336(3),340(2),112(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 11th March 2026.

ANTICIPATORY BAIL

CNR: BRSP010006852026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

667/2026

Filing Date

31-01-2026

Registration No

72/2026

Registration Date

31-01-2026

Court

DJ Div. Sheikhpura

Judge

2-District and Additional Sessions Judge I (Special Judge SC/ST Cases)

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

14

Police Station

SHEIKHPURA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 319(2),318(4),338,336(3),340(2),112(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

SHOBHI KUMAR

Adv. Sri Ram Janam Prasad Singh

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF BIHAR Advocate - Sri Uday Narayan Sinha

Hearing History

Judge: 2-District and Additional Sessions Judge I (Special Judge SC/ST Cases)

11-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

HEARING

25-02-2026

HEARING

23-02-2026

HEARING

21-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Copy of Bail Order

Case Summary The court rejected Shobhi Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in a Sub-Inspector Police exam impersonation case. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence of cheating and impersonation: another person was caught using Kumar's admit card and Aadhaar card during the exam, and Kumar was specifically named by the arrested impersonator as having orchestrated the scheme for ₹50,000, warranting detailed investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court rejected Shobhi Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in a Sub-Inspector Police exam impersonation case. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence of cheating and impersonation: another person was caught using Kumar's admit card and Aadhaar card during the exam, and Kumar was specifically named by the arrested impersonator as having orchestrated the scheme for ₹50,000, warranting detailed investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Sheikhpura All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case