RAMDULARI DEVI vs CHANDESHWAR MAHTO Advocate - Brajesh kumar singh — 135/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 364,302,201,120B,34. Status: Appearence. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
SESSION CASE
CNR: BRSO010024592022
Filing Number
2446/2022
Filing Date
13-Sep-2022
Registration No
135/2022
Registration Date
13-Sep-2022
Court
Sheohar DJ Div.
Judge
9-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-IV
Last updated 18-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
108
Police Station
PIPRAHI
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAMDULARI DEVI
Adv. Suresh Roy P.P
Respondent(s)
-
1.CHANDESHWAR MAHTO Advocate - Brajesh kumar singh
-
2.MUKESH KUMAR
-
3.JAGRANATH RAY
-
4.MD BIKAU MIYA
-
5.MD SOFAID
Case History
-
19-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-May-2026
Appearence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-IV
-
22-Apr-2026
Appearence
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-IV
-
15-Apr-2026
Charge
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-IV
-
26-Mar-2026
Charge
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Charge
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
Charge
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Feb-2026
Charge
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Feb-2026
Charge
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Jan-2026
Charge
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Jan-2026
Appearence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Dec-2025
Appearence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Nov-2025
Appearence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Nov-2025
Appearence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
01-Nov-2025
Appearence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Oct-2025
Appearence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Sep-2025
Appearence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Aug-2025
Appearence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Aug-2025
Appearence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Jul-2025
Appearence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
30-Jun-2025
Appearence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
26-May-2025
Appearence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Apr-2025
Appearence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Mar-2025
Appearence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
03-Mar-2025
Appearence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Feb-2025
OrderView PDF
Court Order Summary Outcome: All four accused—Prem Sahni, Gajendra Sah, Pramod Ram, and Nawab Thakur—were acquitted of charges under IPC sections 395 and 397 (dacoity) by the Principal Sessions Judge, Sheohar on February 24, 2025. The court found the prosecution failed to establish any link between the accused and the alleged motorcycle robbery, as no witness identified the accused and no test identification parade was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Feb-2025
Appearence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Feb-2025
Appearence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
22-Jan-2025
Appearence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Jan-2025
Appearence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Nov-2024
Appearence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Nov-2024
Appearence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Oct-2024
Appearence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Sep-2024
Appearence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Aug-2024
Appearence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Aug-2024
Appearence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Jul-2024
Appearence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
03-Jul-2024
Appearence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Jun-2024
Appearence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
21-May-2024
Appearence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
29-Apr-2024
Appearence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Mar-2024
Appearence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Feb-2024
Appearence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Feb-2024
Charge
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Jan-2024
Charge
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Dec-2023
Charge
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Nov-2023
Charge
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Oct-2023
Charge
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
14-Sep-2023
Charge
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
31-Aug-2023
Charge
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Aug-2023
Charge
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Aug-2023
Charge
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Jul-2023
Charge
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Jul-2023
Charge
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Jun-2023
Charge
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
14-Jun-2023
Charge
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
31-May-2023
Charge
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
17-May-2023
Charge
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
03-May-2023
Charge
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Apr-2023
Charge
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Apr-2023
Charge
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
29-Mar-2023
Charge
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Mar-2023
Charge
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
01-Mar-2023
Charge
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Feb-2023
Charge
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Feb-2023
Charge
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Jan-2023
Charge
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
05-Jan-2023
Charge
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
22-Dec-2022
Charge
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
08-Dec-2022
Charge
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Nov-2022
Charge
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
14-Nov-2022
Charge
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
01-Nov-2022
Charge
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Oct-2022
Charge
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Oct-2022
Charge
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Sep-2022
Charge
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Sep-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Sep-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 135/2022
Court Order Summary Outcome: All four accused—Prem Sahni, Gajendra Sah, Pramod Ram, and Nawab Thakur—were acquitted of charges under IPC sections 395 and 397 (dacoity) by the Principal Sessions Judge, Sheohar on February 24, 2025. The court found the prosecution failed to establish any link between the accused and the alleged motorcycle robbery, as no witness identified the accused and no test identification parade was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts