S.I SURAJ KUMAR GUPTA vs RAMESHWAR RAY — 694/2020

Case under Excise Act (Bihar) Section 30(a),37(C). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 12th May 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 12-May-2026

Spl Case (EXCISE)

CNR: BRSO010024432020

Filing Number

1613/2020

Filing Date

31-Dec-2020

Registration No

694/2020

Registration Date

31-Dec-2020

Court

Sheohar DJ Div.

Judge

4-Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

297

Police Station

PIPRAHI

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Excise Act (Bihar) Section 30(a),37(C)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S.I SURAJ KUMAR GUPTA

    Adv. NA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMESHWAR RAY

  2. 2.DINESH THAKUR

  3. 3.MADHURENDRA KUMAR

Case History

  1. 12-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  3. 12-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  4. 19-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  5. 18-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  6. 28-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  7. 13-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  8. 23-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  9. 28-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  10. 04-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  11. 21-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  12. 12-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  13. 14-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  14. 23-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  15. 16-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  16. 20-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  17. 16-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  18. 22-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  19. 21-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  20. 13-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  21. 28-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  22. 16-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  23. 27-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  24. 13-Dec-2022

    Charge

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  25. 15-Sep-2022

    Appearence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  26. 21-Jun-2022

    Appearence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

  27. 22-Mar-2022

    Appearence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

  28. 10-Jan-2022

    Awaited/supply of Final Form/Chargesheet

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

  29. 21-Sep-2021

    Awaited/supply of Final Form/Chargesheet

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

  30. 22-Jun-2021

    Awaited/supply of Final Form/Chargesheet

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

  31. 08-Apr-2021

    Awaited/supply of Final Form/Chargesheet

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  32. 12-Jan-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 04-Jan-2021

    OrderView PDF

    Summary Bail granted to accused Mahendra Kumar and Birendra Thakur under Section 437 CrPC with conditions including a bond of Rs. 10,000 each and a surety of the same amount. The court found that the allegations under IPC 2018 sections 101 and 30(5) were not sufficiently established, and the accused were not flight risks. They are to be released on bail subject to the specified conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  34. 31-Dec-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 694/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Summary Bail granted to accused Mahendra Kumar and Birendra Thakur under Section 437 CrPC with conditions including a bond of Rs. 10,000 each and a surety of the same amount. The court found that the allegations under IPC 2018 sections 101 and 30(5) were not sufficiently established, and the accused were not flight risks. They are to be released on bail subject to the specified conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case