RAGHUNATH PRASAD vs RIMA DEVI — 684/2020

Case under Excise Act (Bihar) Section 30(A). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 30-Apr-2026

Spl Case (EXCISE)

CNR: BRSO010024222020

Filing Number

1602/2020

Filing Date

31-Dec-2020

Registration No

684/2020

Registration Date

31-Dec-2020

Court

Sheohar DJ Div.

Judge

4-Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

407

Police Station

SHEOHAR

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Excise Act (Bihar) Section 30(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAGHUNATH PRASAD

    Adv. N/A

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RIMA DEVI

  2. 2.PHULA DEVI

Case History

  1. 30-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  3. 12-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  4. 18-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  5. 19-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  6. 30-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  7. 18-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  8. 19-May-2025

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  9. 24-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  10. 01-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  11. 26-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  12. 25-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  13. 16-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  14. 19-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  15. 26-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  16. 11-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  17. 12-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  18. 28-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  19. 14-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  20. 26-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  21. 15-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  22. 03-May-2023

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  23. 21-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  24. 02-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  25. 26-Dec-2022

    Appearence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  26. 12-Oct-2022

    Appearence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  27. 13-Jul-2022

    Appearence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

  28. 23-Apr-2022

    Appearence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

  29. 23-Mar-2022

    Appearence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

  30. 24-Nov-2021

    Appearence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

  31. 12-Aug-2021

    Awaited/supply of Police papers/Final Form/Chargesheet

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

  32. 10-Jun-2021

    Awaited/supply of Police papers/Final Form/Chargesheet

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

  33. 31-Mar-2021

    Awaited/supply of Police papers/Final Form/Chargesheet

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  34. 06-Jan-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 04-Jan-2021

    OrderView PDF

    Summary Bail granted to accused Rima Devi and Phoola Devi with a bond of Rs. 10,000 each in a case registered under IPC Section 2018 and relevant provisions. The court found the allegations of criminal intimidation and wrongful restraint lack substantive evidence, and the accused are not flight risks. Both accused are directed to furnish personal bonds and cooperate with the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  36. 31-Dec-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 684/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Summary Bail granted to accused Rima Devi and Phoola Devi with a bond of Rs. 10,000 each in a case registered under IPC Section 2018 and relevant provisions. The court found the allegations of criminal intimidation and wrongful restraint lack substantive evidence, and the accused are not flight risks. Both accused are directed to furnish personal bonds and cooperate with the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case