RAJIV RANJAN vs PRAMOD KUMAR Advocate - Arun kumar singh — 646/2020

Case under Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act 2016 Section 30(a),30(d). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 12th May 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 12-May-2026

Spl Case (EXCISE)

CNR: BRSO010023042020

Filing Number

1528/2020

Filing Date

15-Dec-2020

Registration No

646/2020

Registration Date

15-Dec-2020

Court

Sheohar DJ Div.

Judge

4-Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

112

Police Station

Excise P.S

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act 2016 Section 30(a),30(d)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJIV RANJAN

    Adv. NA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRAMOD KUMAR Advocate - Arun kumar singh

Case History

  1. 12-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  3. 12-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  4. 19-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  5. 18-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  6. 28-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  7. 13-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  8. 28-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  9. 04-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  10. 16-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  11. 12-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  12. 25-Oct-2024

    Charge

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  13. 21-Sep-2024

    Police Paper

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  14. 30-Jul-2024

    Police Paper

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  15. 04-May-2024

    Appearence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  16. 06-Feb-2024

    Appearence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  17. 07-Nov-2023

    Appearence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  18. 21-Aug-2023

    Appearence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  19. 23-May-2023

    Appearence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  20. 27-Feb-2023

    Appearence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  21. 01-Dec-2022

    Appearence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  22. 30-Sep-2022

    Appearence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  23. 01-Aug-2022

    Awaited/supply of Final Form/Chargesheet

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  24. 13-Jun-2022

    Awaited/supply of Final Form/Chargesheet

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

  25. 04-Apr-2022

    Awaited/supply of Final Form/Chargesheet

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

  26. 01-Feb-2022

    Awaited/supply of Final Form/Chargesheet

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

  27. 09-Dec-2021

    Awaited/supply of Final Form/Chargesheet

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

  28. 22-Nov-2021

    Awaited/supply of Final Form/Chargesheet

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

  29. 08-Sep-2021

    Awaited/supply of Final Form/Chargesheet

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

  30. 19-Jun-2021

    Awaited/supply of Final Form/Chargesheet

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

  31. 22-Apr-2021

    Awaited/supply of Final Form/Chargesheet

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

  32. 20-Jan-2021

    Awaited/supply of Final Form/Chargesheet

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  33. 11-Jan-2021

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The petition for anticipatory bail filed under Section 438 CrPC is dismissed. The court found that the applicant's arrest was legally warranted based on credible evidence of illegal possession and transportation of forest products (2×100 kg of wood and other materials). The court rejected the plea of anticipatory bail, stating that the applicant cannot claim immunity when substantial incriminating material exists against them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  34. 06-Jan-2021

    Awaited/supply of Final Form/Chargesheet

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  35. 24-Dec-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  36. 15-Dec-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 646/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The petition for anticipatory bail filed under Section 438 CrPC is dismissed. The court found that the applicant's arrest was legally warranted based on credible evidence of illegal possession and transportation of forest products (2×100 kg of wood and other materials). The court rejected the plea of anticipatory bail, stating that the applicant cannot claim immunity when substantial incriminating material exists against them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case