RAJIV RANJAN vs PRAMOD KUMAR Advocate - Arun kumar singh — 646/2020
Case under Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act 2016 Section 30(a),30(d). Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 12th May 2026.
Spl Case (EXCISE)
CNR: BRSO010023042020
Next Hearing
12th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1528/2020
Filing Date
15-12-2020
Registration No
646/2020
Registration Date
15-12-2020
Court
Sheohar DJ Div.
Judge
4-Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court
FIR Details
FIR Number
112
Police Station
Excise P.S
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJIV RANJAN
Adv. NA
Respondent(s)
PRAMOD KUMAR Advocate - Arun kumar singh
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 12-01-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 19-11-2025 | EVIDENCE | |
| 18-09-2025 | EVIDENCE | |
| 28-07-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary The petition for anticipatory bail filed under Section 438 CrPC is dismissed. The court found that the applicant's arrest was legally warranted based on credible evidence of illegal possession and transportation of forest products (2×100 kg of wood and other materials). The court rejected the plea of anticipatory bail, stating that the applicant cannot claim immunity when substantial incriminating material exists against them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The petition for anticipatory bail filed under Section 438 CrPC is dismissed. The court found that the applicant's arrest was legally warranted based on credible evidence of illegal possession and transportation of forest products (2×100 kg of wood and other materials). The court rejected the plea of anticipatory bail, stating that the applicant cannot claim immunity when substantial incriminating material exists against them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts