NAVEEN KUMAR SAHI vs VIKASH KUMAR Advocate - Dinesh kumar — 120/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 80(2),3(5),. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 15th April 2026.
SESSION CASE
CNR: BRSO010019172025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1797/2025
Filing Date
25-08-2025
Registration No
120/2025
Registration Date
25-08-2025
Court
Sheohar DJ Div.
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
289
Police Station
SHEOHAR
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NAVEEN KUMAR SAHI
Adv. Suresh Roy P.P
Respondent(s)
VIKASH KUMAR Advocate - Dinesh kumar
KAILASH RAI
MAINA DEVI URF NAINA DEVI
USHA DEVI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
ARGUMENTS
STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C.
STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 16-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 09-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 06-03-2026 | STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C. | |
| 19-02-2026 | STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary State vs. Vikas Kumar & Others | Sheohar Sessions Court | April 15, 2026 The court acquitted all four accused persons (Vikas Kumar, Kailash Rai, Maina Devi, and Usha Devi) of charges under BNS Sections 80(2), 3(5) & 103(1) in a dowry death case. The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as three key prosecution witnesses—including the informant and the deceased's brother—were declared hostile and contradicted the charges during cross-examination, instead attributing the death to the victim's pre-existing mental illness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary State vs. Vikas Kumar & Others | Sheohar Sessions Court | April 15, 2026 The court acquitted all four accused persons (Vikas Kumar, Kailash Rai, Maina Devi, and Usha Devi) of charges under BNS Sections 80(2), 3(5) & 103(1) in a dowry death case. The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as three key prosecution witnesses—including the informant and the deceased's brother—were declared hostile and contradicted the charges during cross-examination, instead attributing the death to the victim's pre-existing mental illness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts