UMESH SAHNI vs SOMARI DEVI — 77/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,149,323,325,341,342,307,504. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 09th March 2026.
SESSION CASE
CNR: BRSO010018702023
Filing Number
1866/2023
Filing Date
10-May-2023
Registration No
77/2023
Registration Date
10-May-2023
Court
Sheohar DJ Div.
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 18-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
42
Police Station
SHYAMPUR BHATAHA
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.UMESH SAHNI
Adv. Suresh Roy P.P
Respondent(s)
-
1.SOMARI DEVI
-
2.UMA SHANKAR SAHNI@ UMA SAHNI
-
3.MAHESH SAHNI
-
4.SANJIT KUMAR@SANJIT SAHNI
-
5.VIRENDRA SHANI
-
6.SHATRUDHAN SAHNI
-
7.RAJMANGAL SAHNI
-
8.UPENDRA SAHNI
-
9.BHAJAN SAHNI
-
10.VINOD SAHNI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary State v. Somari Devi & Others (Sessions Trial No. 77/2023, Sheohar District Court, 09.03.2026) The court acquitted all ten accused persons of charges under Sections 147, 307/149, 323/149, 341/149, 342/149, 504/149, and 325/149 IPC. The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt because three key witnesses (including the informant) turned hostile and retracted their allegations, most victims couldn't identify the perpetrators due to covered faces, and parties had already reached an amicable settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Feb-2026
Judgement
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
22-Jan-2026
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Jan-2026
Defence Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Dec-2025
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Dec-2025
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Nov-2025
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Jun-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
15-May-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
22-Apr-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Mar-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Feb-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Jan-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Jan-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Dec-2024
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
14-Nov-2024
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Sep-2024
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Aug-2024
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
03-Aug-2024
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Jul-2024
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
28-May-2024
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
20-May-2024
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Apr-2024
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2024
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Feb-2024
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Jan-2024
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Dec-2023
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
30-Nov-2023
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
01-Nov-2023
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Oct-2023
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Sep-2023
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Jul-2023
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Jun-2023
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Jun-2023
Charge
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
30-May-2023
Charge
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
25-May-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-May-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 77/2023
Case Summary State v. Somari Devi & Others (Sessions Trial No. 77/2023, Sheohar District Court, 09.03.2026) The court acquitted all ten accused persons of charges under Sections 147, 307/149, 323/149, 341/149, 342/149, 504/149, and 325/149 IPC. The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt because three key witnesses (including the informant) turned hostile and retracted their allegations, most victims couldn't identify the perpetrators due to covered faces, and parties had already reached an amicable settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts