UMESH SAHNI vs SOMARI DEVI — 77/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,149,323,325,341,342,307,504,. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 09th March 2026.
SESSION CASE
CNR: BRSO010018702023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1866/2023
Filing Date
10-05-2023
Registration No
77/2023
Registration Date
10-05-2023
Court
Sheohar DJ Div.
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
42
Police Station
SHYAMPUR BHATAHA
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
UMESH SAHNI
Adv. Suresh Roy P.P
Respondent(s)
SOMARI DEVI
UMA SHANKAR SAHNI@ UMA SAHNI
MAHESH SAHNI
SANJIT KUMAR@SANJIT SAHNI
VIRENDRA SHANI
SHATRUDHAN SAHNI
RAJMANGAL SAHNI
UPENDRA SAHNI
BHAJAN SAHNI
VINOD SAHNI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
ARGUMENTS
DEFENCE EVIDENCE
STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 02-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 22-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 13-01-2026 | DEFENCE EVIDENCE | |
| 23-12-2025 | STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary State v. Somari Devi & Others (Sessions Trial No. 77/2023, Sheohar District Court, 09.03.2026) The court acquitted all ten accused persons of charges under Sections 147, 307/149, 323/149, 341/149, 342/149, 504/149, and 325/149 IPC. The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt because three key witnesses (including the informant) turned hostile and retracted their allegations, most victims couldn't identify the perpetrators due to covered faces, and parties had already reached an amicable settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary State v. Somari Devi & Others (Sessions Trial No. 77/2023, Sheohar District Court, 09.03.2026) The court acquitted all ten accused persons of charges under Sections 147, 307/149, 323/149, 341/149, 342/149, 504/149, and 325/149 IPC. The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt because three key witnesses (including the informant) turned hostile and retracted their allegations, most victims couldn't identify the perpetrators due to covered faces, and parties had already reached an amicable settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts