ASI RAMBACHAN RAY vs Unknown — 683/2025

Case under Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act 2016 Section 30(a). Disposed: Uncontested--Final Form Accepted on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Spl Case (EXCISE)

CNR: BRSO010012682025

Filing Number

1187/2025

Filing Date

18-Jun-2025

Registration No

683/2025

Registration Date

18-Jun-2025

Court

Sheohar DJ Div.

Judge

4-Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Final Form Accepted

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0250

Police Station

TARIYANI

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act 2016 Section 30(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASI (Assistant Sub-Inspector) RAMBACHAN RAY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Unknown

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The court accepted the Final Form filed by the Investigating Officer in this excise case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act 2016. Although the investigation found the case to be factually true, no clues were discovered against the unknown accused, and the Excise Public Prosecutor raised no objection to the closure. The court accordingly accepted the Final Form and directed the record to be sent to the record room. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  6. 11-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  7. 14-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  8. 18-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 18-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 683/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court accepted the Final Form filed by the Investigating Officer in this excise case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act 2016. Although the investigation found the case to be factually true, no clues were discovered against the unknown accused, and the Excise Public Prosecutor raised no objection to the closure. The court accordingly accepted the Final Form and directed the record to be sent to the record room. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case