A.S.I, ARVIND KUMAR SINGH vs RAJESH YADAV — 275/2020

Case under Excise Act (Bihar) Section 37(C). Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED & FINED on 20th May 2026.

Case disposed

Spl Case (EXCISE)

CNR: BRSO010010962020

Filing Number

752/2020

Filing Date

09-Jul-2020

Registration No

275/2020

Registration Date

09-Jul-2020

Court

Sheohar DJ Div.

Judge

4-Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

Decision Date

20-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED & FINED

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

128

Police Station

PIPRAHI

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Excise Act (Bihar) Section 37(C)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.A.S.I, ARVIND KUMAR SINGH

    Adv. NA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJESH YADAV

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-May-2026

    OrderView PDF

  3. 20-May-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court upheld charges against Rajesh Kumar Yadav under Section 37(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, for alleged liquor possession and consumption. The court found the prosecution evidence sufficient and rejected the accused's defense statement, directing him to deposit Rs. 2,500 as interim penalty while the case proceeds to trial under amended regulations of 2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 20-May-2026

    Disposed

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Appearence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  6. 08-Jan-2026

    Appearence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  7. 17-Oct-2025

    Appearence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  8. 21-Jul-2025

    Appearence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  9. 25-Apr-2025

    Appearence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  10. 29-Jan-2025

    Appearence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  11. 11-Nov-2024

    Appearence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  12. 02-Aug-2024

    Appearence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  13. 08-May-2024

    Appearence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  14. 09-Feb-2024

    Appearence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  15. 10-Nov-2023

    Appearence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  16. 18-Aug-2023

    Appearence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  17. 23-May-2023

    Appearence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  18. 27-Feb-2023

    Appearence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  19. 02-Dec-2022

    Appearence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  20. 28-Sep-2022

    Appearence

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  21. 29-Jun-2022

    Appearence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

  22. 30-Mar-2022

    Appearence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

  23. 25-Jan-2022

    Awaited/supply of Final Form/Chargesheet

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

  24. 09-Oct-2021

    Awaited/supply of Final Form/Chargesheet

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

  25. 25-Jun-2021

    Awaited/supply of Final Form/Chargesheet

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

  26. 02-Jun-2021

    Awaited/supply of Final Form/Chargesheet

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

  27. 17-Apr-2021

    Awaited/supply of Final Form/Chargesheet

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

  28. 19-Jan-2021

    Awaited/supply of Final Form/Chargesheet

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  29. 21-Oct-2020

    Awaited/supply of Final Form/Chargesheet

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  30. 04-Aug-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 09-Jul-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 275/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court upheld charges against Rajesh Kumar Yadav under Section 37(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, for alleged liquor possession and consumption. The court found the prosecution evidence sufficient and rejected the accused's defense statement, directing him to deposit Rs. 2,500 as interim penalty while the case proceeds to trial under amended regulations of 2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case