GUNJAN SINGH URF AMITAB GUNJAN vs State of Bihar — 94/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),74,109(1),118(2),352. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 04th April 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSO010006282026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

11-03-2026

Filing Number

579/2026

Filing Date

11-03-2026

Registration No

94/2026

Registration Date

11-03-2026

Court

Sheohar DJ Div.

Judge

3-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

04th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

53

Police Station

PIPRAHI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),74,109(1),118(2),352
Arms Act Section 27

Petitioner(s)

GUNJAN SINGH URF AMITAB GUNJAN

Adv. Amlesh kumar

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 3-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

04-04-2026

Disposed

30-03-2026

HEARING

24-03-2026

HEARING

16-03-2026

HEARING

13-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

04-04-2026
Order

Summary of Case 94/2026: The court granted anticipatory bail to Gunjan Singh @ Amitab Gunjan in connection with charges under IPC sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 74, 109(1), 352, 351(2), 351(3), and the Arms Act. The court found that while the FIR alleged firing on the informant's side, the record showed no actual injury from firearm use and lacked specific allegations or injury reports against the petitioner. Accordingly, bail was granted on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, subject to section 482(2) B.N.S.S. conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 94/2026: The court granted anticipatory bail to Gunjan Singh @ Amitab Gunjan in connection with charges under IPC sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 74, 109(1), 352, 351(2), 351(3), and the Arms Act. The court found that while the FIR alleged firing on the informant's side, the record showed no actual injury from firearm use and lacked specific allegations or injury reports against the petitioner. Accordingly, bail was granted on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, subject to section 482(2) B.N.S.S. conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sheohar DJ Div. All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case