RAMPRAVESH KUMAR URF RAMPRAESH SAHNI vs State of Bihar — 90/2026

Case under Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act 2016 Section 30(a). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 26th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSO010006072026

e-Filing Number

09-03-2026

Filing Number

562/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

90/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Sheohar DJ Div.

Judge

4-Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

Decision Date

26-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 18-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

162

Police Station

PURNAHIA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act 2016 Section 30(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMPRAVESH KUMAR URF RAMPRAESH SAHNI

    Adv. Suresh kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by Rampraveesh Kumar under the Bihar Prohibition of Liquor and Excise Production Act, 2018. The court found that the applicant was arrested with 30.9 liters of illegal Nepalese liquor and had a prior criminal history, making him ineligible for bail under Section 76(2) of the Act, which specifically prohibits anticipatory bail in liquor-related offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    Awaiting for Case Diary

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Awaiting for Case Diary

    Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 90/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by Rampraveesh Kumar under the Bihar Prohibition of Liquor and Excise Production Act, 2018. The court found that the applicant was arrested with 30.9 liters of illegal Nepalese liquor and had a prior criminal history, making him ineligible for bail under Section 76(2) of the Act, which specifically prohibits anticipatory bail in liquor-related offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case