LALBABU RAM vs State of Bihar — 89/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),85,352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSO010006062026
e-Filing Number
09-03-2026
Filing Number
561/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
89/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Court
Sheohar DJ Div.
Judge
3-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
13-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 18-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
35
Police Station
Mahila Thana
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LALBABU RAM
Adv. Suresh kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-May-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The court granted anticipatory bail to Lalbabu Ram in a dowry harassment case (IPC §126(2), 115(2), 85, 352, 3(5) and D.P. Act). The court found that while the husband allegedly demanded dowry and drove out his wife after she gave birth, he has no criminal antecedents and expressed willingness to keep his wife with dignity. The court ordered his release on a Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties, considering the wife's unwillingness to reconcile despite settlement efforts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-May-2026
Disposed
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
08-May-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
02-May-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
29-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
23-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
18-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
08-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
28-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 89/2026
Summary The court granted anticipatory bail to Lalbabu Ram in a dowry harassment case (IPC §126(2), 115(2), 85, 352, 3(5) and D.P. Act). The court found that while the husband allegedly demanded dowry and drove out his wife after she gave birth, he has no criminal antecedents and expressed willingness to keep his wife with dignity. The court ordered his release on a Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties, considering the wife's unwillingness to reconcile despite settlement efforts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts