MD HUSAIN AKHTAR vs STATE OF BIHAR — 88/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 406,420. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSO010005862026

Filing Number

541/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

88/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

Sheohar DJ Div.

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

54

Police Station

SHYAMPUR BHATAHA

Year

2013

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 406,420

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MD HUSAIN AKHTAR

    Adv. Ajay kumar

  2. 2.MD BASIR AHMAD KHAN

  3. 3.RAMKISHOR SINGH URF SUMAN

  4. 4.KAMLESH KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge, Sheohar, rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by four school headmasters (Md. Hussain Akhtar and others) accused of criminal breach of trust and cheating under IPC sections 406 and 420. The court found prima facie evidence that the petitioners, as headmasters, colluded with an NGO to misappropriate government funds meant for computer education by fraudulently obtaining student signatures on attendance registers for two-month courses when education was imparted for only 5-7 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 88/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Sheohar, rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by four school headmasters (Md. Hussain Akhtar and others) accused of criminal breach of trust and cheating under IPC sections 406 and 420. The court found prima facie evidence that the petitioners, as headmasters, colluded with an NGO to misappropriate government funds meant for computer education by fraudulently obtaining student signatures on attendance registers for two-month courses when education was imparted for only 5-7 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case