MANOJ RAY vs STATE OF BIHAR — 86/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 26(2),115(2),75,76. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSO010005612026

Filing Number

518/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

86/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Sheohar DJ Div.

Judge

3-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

63

Police Station

SHEOHAR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 26(2),115(2),75,76

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANOJ RAY

    Adv. Dharmendra kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court granted anticipatory bail to Manoj Ray in a case involving charges under sections 126(2), 115(2), 75, and 76 of the BNS (alleged sexual assault). The court found the prosecution's story improbable due to delayed FIR filing and lack of medical evidence production within 16 days, and noted the petitioner had no criminal history. Ray was directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and comply with standard bail conditions under section 482(2) BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 86/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted anticipatory bail to Manoj Ray in a case involving charges under sections 126(2), 115(2), 75, and 76 of the BNS (alleged sexual assault). The court found the prosecution's story improbable due to delayed FIR filing and lack of medical evidence production within 16 days, and noted the petitioner had no criminal history. Ray was directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and comply with standard bail conditions under section 482(2) BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case