HARIESHWAR RAY vs State of Bihar — 75/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 329(4),126(2),115(2),76,352,118(1),3(5). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSO010005092026

e-Filing Number

23-02-2026

Filing Number

471/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

75/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

Sheohar DJ Div.

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN

Last updated 18-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

34

Police Station

TARIYANI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 329(4),126(2),115(2),76,352,118(1),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARIESHWAR RAY

    Adv. Dharmendra Kumar

  2. 2.DEVENDRA RAY

    Adv. Dharmendra Kumar

  3. 3.SARWAN RAY

    Adv. Dharmendra Kumar

  4. 4.NITISH RAY

    Adv. Dharmendra Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court order, dated 18.3.2026, directs the respondents (identified as Hari Ram, Kailash Ram, Bijendra Ram, and Sarvjan Ram) to vacate the disputed property and restore possession to the applicant within 24 hours. The court found the applicant's claim to be valid and ordered the respondents to comply with the vacate notice issued on 23.02.2026, with further directions for implementation of this order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 75/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court order, dated 18.3.2026, directs the respondents (identified as Hari Ram, Kailash Ram, Bijendra Ram, and Sarvjan Ram) to vacate the disputed property and restore possession to the applicant within 24 hours. The court found the applicant's claim to be valid and ordered the respondents to comply with the vacate notice issued on 23.02.2026, with further directions for implementation of this order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case