DINBANDHU RAY vs State of Bihar — 21/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRSO010004172026

e-Filing Number

13-02-2026

Filing Number

387/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

21/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Court

Sheohar DJ Div.

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 18-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

46

Police Station

TARIYANI

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DINBANDHU RAY

    Adv. Pravin kumar singh

  2. 2.BHOLA RAY

    Adv. Pravin kumar singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Sheohar rejected the bail petition of Dinbandhu Rai and Bhola Rai, who are accused of causing the death of an informant's wife during a drunken altercation. While the court found no premeditation or weapons involved and the postmortem revealed no injuries, it denied bail considering the serious nature of the allegations and the petitioners' criminal antecedents. The petitioners may renew their bail application after charges are framed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 21/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Sheohar rejected the bail petition of Dinbandhu Rai and Bhola Rai, who are accused of causing the death of an informant's wife during a drunken altercation. While the court found no premeditation or weapons involved and the postmortem revealed no injuries, it denied bail considering the serious nature of the allegations and the petitioners' criminal antecedents. The petitioners may renew their bail application after charges are framed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case