RAMJANAM RAY vs State of Bihar — 54/2026

Case under Dowry Prohibition (d.p) Act Section 3,4. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSO010003732026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

10-02-2026

Filing Number

346/2026

Filing Date

10-02-2026

Registration No

54/2026

Registration Date

10-02-2026

Court

Sheohar DJ Div.

Judge

3-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

01st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

475

Police Station

SHEOHAR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Dowry Prohibition (D.P) Act Section 3,4

Petitioner(s)

RAMJANAM RAY

Adv. Yogendra sah

PRAMOD RAY

Adv. Yogendra sah

SUBODH RAY

Adv. Yogendra sah

MINA DEVI

Adv. Yogendra sah

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 3-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

01-04-2026

Disposed

19-03-2026

HEARING

10-03-2026

HEARING

09-03-2026

HEARING

25-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

01-04-2026
Order

The court granted anticipatory bail to the four petitioners (Ramjanam Ray, Pramod Ray, Subodh Ray, and Mina Devi) in a dowry demand case under Section 3/4 D.P. Act. The court found that the informant's allegations lacked documentary evidence, the accused persons had no criminal antecedents, and the person allegedly given money was not the petitioner. The petitioners were directed to furnish bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and comply with bail conditions under Section 482(2) B.N.S.S. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted anticipatory bail to the four petitioners (Ramjanam Ray, Pramod Ray, Subodh Ray, and Mina Devi) in a dowry demand case under Section 3/4 D.P. Act. The court found that the informant's allegations lacked documentary evidence, the accused persons had no criminal antecedents, and the person allegedly given money was not the petitioner. The petitioners were directed to furnish bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and comply with bail conditions under Section 482(2) B.N.S.S. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sheohar DJ Div. All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case