RAMJANAM RAY vs State of Bihar — 54/2026
Case under Dowry Prohibition (D.p) Act Section 3,4. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSO010003732026
e-Filing Number
10-02-2026
Filing Number
346/2026
Filing Date
10-Feb-2026
Registration No
54/2026
Registration Date
10-Feb-2026
Court
Sheohar DJ Div.
Judge
3-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 18-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
475
Police Station
SHEOHAR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAMJANAM RAY
Adv. Yogendra sah
-
2.PRAMOD RAY
Adv. Yogendra sah
-
3.SUBODH RAY
Adv. Yogendra sah
-
4.MINA DEVI
Adv. Yogendra sah
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
The court granted anticipatory bail to the four petitioners (Ramjanam Ray, Pramod Ray, Subodh Ray, and Mina Devi) in a dowry demand case under Section 3/4 D.P. Act. The court found that the informant's allegations lacked documentary evidence, the accused persons had no criminal antecedents, and the person allegedly given money was not the petitioner. The petitioners were directed to furnish bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and comply with bail conditions under Section 482(2) B.N.S.S. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
19-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
25-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
20-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
12-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
11-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 54/2026
The court granted anticipatory bail to the four petitioners (Ramjanam Ray, Pramod Ray, Subodh Ray, and Mina Devi) in a dowry demand case under Section 3/4 D.P. Act. The court found that the informant's allegations lacked documentary evidence, the accused persons had no criminal antecedents, and the person allegedly given money was not the petitioner. The petitioners were directed to furnish bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and comply with bail conditions under Section 482(2) B.N.S.S. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts