RAM VINAY SINGH vs HAFIJ MIYA Advocate - Rajesh kumar — 63/2016
Case under Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act 2016 Section 47(a). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 12th March 2026.
Spl Case (EXCISE)
CNR: BRSO010002102016
Filing Number
63/2016
Filing Date
24-07-2016
Registration No
63/2016
Registration Date
24-07-2016
Court
Sheohar DJ Div.
Judge
4-Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
63
Police Station
Excise P.S
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAM VINAY SINGH
Adv. Brajesh kumar singh
Respondent(s)
HAFIJ MIYA Advocate - Rajesh kumar
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 12-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 11-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 29-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Exclusive Special Judge, Excise Court in Sheohar acquitted Hafij Miya of charges under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, finding the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court found discrepancies in the prosecution's evidence, noting that no contraband was properly seized or produced, the witness testimony was inconsistent, and the investigation lacked credibility, thereby benefiting the accused with the presumption of innocence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Exclusive Special Judge, Excise Court in Sheohar acquitted Hafij Miya of charges under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, finding the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court found discrepancies in the prosecution's evidence, noting that no contraband was properly seized or produced, the witness testimony was inconsistent, and the investigation lacked credibility, thereby benefiting the accused with the presumption of innocence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts