RAMNAGINA PRASAD vs State of Bihar — 30/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),74,352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSO010001992026

e-Filing Number

22-01-2026

Filing Number

185/2026

Filing Date

22-Jan-2026

Registration No

30/2026

Registration Date

22-Jan-2026

Court

Sheohar DJ Div.

Judge

3-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

23

Police Station

SC/ST P.S

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),74,352,3(5)
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 3(i)(r)(s),3(2)(va)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMNAGINA PRASAD

    Adv. Yogendra sah

  2. 2.RAMSWARTH PRASAD

    Adv. Yogendra sah

  3. 3.CHANDRASHEKHAR PRASAD URF MUNNA PRASAD

    Adv. Yogendra sah

  4. 4.NANDU PASWAN

    Adv. Yogendra sah

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by four petitioners (Ramnagina Prasad, Ramswarth Prasad, Chandrashekhar Prasad, and Nandu Paswan) in a case involving charges under the SC/ST Act for alleged harassment, assault with weapons, and caste-based abuse. The court held that anticipatory bail is not maintainable under Section 18 of the SC/ST Act, and since the petitioners have no criminal antecedent but face serious charges, enlargement on anticipatory bail was not warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  4. 28-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  8. 28-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  9. 21-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  10. 11-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  11. 05-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  12. 27-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  13. 24-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 22-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 30/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by four petitioners (Ramnagina Prasad, Ramswarth Prasad, Chandrashekhar Prasad, and Nandu Paswan) in a case involving charges under the SC/ST Act for alleged harassment, assault with weapons, and caste-based abuse. The court held that anticipatory bail is not maintainable under Section 18 of the SC/ST Act, and since the petitioners have no criminal antecedent but face serious charges, enlargement on anticipatory bail was not warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case