SONELAL MAHTO vs SHIVSHANKAR MAHTO Advocate - Nagendra sharan — 41/2007
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure (amendment ),act,1984(bihar) Section ORDER96. Disposed: Uncontested--SINE-DIE on 16th March 2026.
TITLE APPEAL
CNR: BRSO010000012007
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
41/2007
Filing Date
02-06-2007
Registration No
41/2007
Registration Date
02-06-2007
Court
Sheohar DJ Div.
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SINE-DIE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SONELAL MAHTO
Adv. Ajay kumar singh
Respondent(s)
SHIVSHANKAR MAHTO Advocate - Nagendra sharan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Awaiting for L. C. R.
Awaiting for L. C. R.
Awaiting for L. C. R.
Awaiting for L. C. R.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Awaiting for L. C. R. | |
| 18-02-2026 | Awaiting for L. C. R. | |
| 09-02-2026 | Awaiting for L. C. R. | |
| 27-01-2026 | Awaiting for L. C. R. |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court ordered that the case record be consigned to the record room pending receipt of the original lower court record from Sitamarhi District, which despite multiple communications since 2016 has not been transmitted. The court found the case cannot proceed without the original record and directed the office to produce the file once the missing record is received. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court ordered that the case record be consigned to the record room pending receipt of the original lower court record from Sitamarhi District, which despite multiple communications since 2016 has not been transmitted. The court found the case cannot proceed without the original record and directed the office to produce the file once the missing record is received. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts