Ritesh Singh and other vs State of Bihar — 158/2026

Case under --- Section 115(2),126(2),127(2),109,117(2),190,191(2),303(2),271,272,351(2),352. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Abp - Aniticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSM200003062026

e-Filing Number

20-02-2026

Filing Number

305/2026

Filing Date

21-Feb-2026

Registration No

158/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Rosera

Judge

1-District and Addl. Sessions Judge I

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

253

Police Station

SINGHIA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

--- Section 115(2),126(2),127(2),109,117(2),190,191(2),303(2),271,272,351(2),352

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ritesh Singh and other

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

  2. 2.Rupesh Singh alias Ritish Kumar Singh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    Case 158/2026 Summary: The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Ritesh Singh and Rupesh Singh, who were accused of assaulting Santosh Jha on 11.12.2025 with iron rods and other weapons, causing grievous injuries, abduction, and theft. The court found that witness statements and medical evidence of grievous injury supported the prosecution case, making denial of bail appropriate given the serious nature of the offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge I

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge I

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 21-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 158/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 158/2026 Summary: The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Ritesh Singh and Rupesh Singh, who were accused of assaulting Santosh Jha on 11.12.2025 with iron rods and other weapons, causing grievous injuries, abduction, and theft. The court found that witness statements and medical evidence of grievous injury supported the prosecution case, making denial of bail appropriate given the serious nature of the offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case