Raju Kumar and Others vs State Of Bihar — 138/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 16th March 2026.
Abp - Aniticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSM200002622026
Filing Number
263/2026
Filing Date
16-02-2026
Registration No
138/2026
Registration Date
16-02-2026
Court
DJ Div. Rosera
Judge
1-District and Addl. Sessions Judge I
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
54
Police Station
BIBHUTIPUR
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Raju Kumar and Others
Adv. Satikant Sahni
Respondent(s)
State Of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Addl. Sessions Judge I
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 10-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 19-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 18-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Raju Kumar, Ganesh Rai alias Yadav, and Sumitra Devi, who were accused of assaulting Kundan Kumar with an iron rod on 31.01.2026, causing grievous injuries. The court found that the prosecution's case was supported by the informant and witnesses in the case diary, and the injuries were confirmed to be grievous in nature, making it unsuitable for anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Raju Kumar, Ganesh Rai alias Yadav, and Sumitra Devi, who were accused of assaulting Kundan Kumar with an iron rod on 31.01.2026, causing grievous injuries. The court found that the prosecution's case was supported by the informant and witnesses in the case diary, and the injuries were confirmed to be grievous in nature, making it unsuitable for anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts