Raju Kumar and Others vs State Of Bihar — 138/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Abp - Aniticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSM200002622026

Filing Number

263/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

138/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Rosera

Judge

1-District and Addl. Sessions Judge I

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

54

Police Station

BIBHUTIPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Raju Kumar and Others

    Adv. Satikant Sahni

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Raju Kumar, Ganesh Rai alias Yadav, and Sumitra Devi, who were accused of assaulting Kundan Kumar with an iron rod on 31.01.2026, causing grievous injuries. The court found that the prosecution's case was supported by the informant and witnesses in the case diary, and the injuries were confirmed to be grievous in nature, making it unsuitable for anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge I

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge I

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge I

  6. 19-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge I

  7. 18-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 138/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Raju Kumar, Ganesh Rai alias Yadav, and Sumitra Devi, who were accused of assaulting Kundan Kumar with an iron rod on 31.01.2026, causing grievous injuries. The court found that the prosecution's case was supported by the informant and witnesses in the case diary, and the injuries were confirmed to be grievous in nature, making it unsuitable for anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case