SHYAM LAL RAY vs State of Bihar Advocate - Sheo Kumar Prasad — 474/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438,440. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION on 07th April 2026.
Cr.revi - Criminal Revision
CNR: BRSM010101302025
e-Filing Number
06-12-2025
Filing Number
8963/2025
Filing Date
24-Dec-2025
Registration No
474/2025
Registration Date
24-Dec-2025
Court
DJ Div. Samastipur
Judge
1-Principal District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
07-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION
Last updated 27-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
87
Police Station
SARAI RANJAN
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHYAM LAL RAY
Adv. VISHWANATH RAI
-
2.Mamta devi
Adv. VISHWANATH RAI
-
3.Sanjeeta kumari
Adv. VISHWANATH RAI
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar Advocate - Sheo Kumar Prasad
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Apr-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
Criminal Revision No. 474/2025 filed by Shyam Lal Ray, Mamta Devi, and Sanjeeta Kumari against the State of Bihar was dismissed by the Principal District & Sessions Judge, Samastipur on 07.04.2026. The court dismissed the revision for non-prosecution at the admission stage as no one appeared on behalf of the petitioners during the hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
23-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
13-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
12-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
03-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 474/2025
Criminal Revision No. 474/2025 filed by Shyam Lal Ray, Mamta Devi, and Sanjeeta Kumari against the State of Bihar was dismissed by the Principal District & Sessions Judge, Samastipur on 07.04.2026. The court dismissed the revision for non-prosecution at the admission stage as no one appeared on behalf of the petitioners during the hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts