kanhaya Kumar vs Deepak Singh — 75/2024
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115,126(2),352.303(2),324(2),308(2). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 11th March 2026.
Cr. Case Complaint (P)
CNR: BRSH010065092024
Filing Number
6508/2024
Filing Date
26-Nov-2024
Registration No
75/2024
Registration Date
26-Nov-2024
Court
DJ Div. Saharsa
Judge
3-District And Additional Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Last updated 17-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.kanhaya Kumar
Adv. Rajeev Ranjan Jha
Respondent(s)
-
1.Deepak Singh
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
Summary The court dismissed the petition filed by the petitioner on March 11, 2026, finding it manifestly without merit. The court held that since no affidavit was filed by the petitioner within the stipulated time and no evidence was presented to support the claims, the petition lacked sufficient grounds for consideration and was therefore rejected under Section 203 CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
District And Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
04-Feb-2026
Soleman Affirmation (S.a)
District And Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
30-Jan-2026
Soleman Affirmation (S.a)
District And Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
14-Nov-2025
Soleman Affirmation (S.a)
District And Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
23-Aug-2025
Soleman Affirmation (S.a)
District And Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
29-Jul-2025
Soleman Affirmation (S.a)
District And Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
25-Jun-2025
Soleman Affirmation (S.a)
District And Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
14-May-2025
Soleman Affirmation (S.a)
District And Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
17-Apr-2025
Soleman Affirmation (S.a)
District And Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
27-Jan-2025
Soleman Affirmation (S.a)
District And Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
11-Dec-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Nov-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 75/2024
Summary The court dismissed the petition filed by the petitioner on March 11, 2026, finding it manifestly without merit. The court held that since no affidavit was filed by the petitioner within the stipulated time and no evidence was presented to support the claims, the petition lacked sufficient grounds for consideration and was therefore rejected under Section 203 CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts