MRINTYUNJAY SINGH vs State of Bihar — 281/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),303(2),109,76,352,351(2),351(3),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSH010020132026

e-Filing Number

10-03-2026

Filing Number

1950/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

281/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Saharsa

Judge

6-District And Aditional Sessions Judge-IV

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED

Last updated 17-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

331

Police Station

MAHISHI

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),303(2),109,76,352,351(2),351(3),3(5)
Arms Act Section 27

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MRINTYUNJAY SINGH

    Adv. Sanjeev Kumar Jha

  2. 2.BHUSHAN SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    Summary The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail application of Mrityunjay Singh, finding his active participation in the alleged shooting incident supported by victim and witness statements, combined with his criminal history of five prior cases making him a habitual offender. However, bail was granted to co-accused Bhushan Singh, as case diary examination revealed no active participation or overt act by him, with the condition that he perform community service at a local temple for six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District And Aditional Sessions Judge-IV

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District And Aditional Sessions Judge-IV

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District And Aditional Sessions Judge-IV

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 281/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail application of Mrityunjay Singh, finding his active participation in the alleged shooting incident supported by victim and witness statements, combined with his criminal history of five prior cases making him a habitual offender. However, bail was granted to co-accused Bhushan Singh, as case diary examination revealed no active participation or overt act by him, with the condition that he perform community service at a local temple for six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case