kranti devi vs Sandeep kumar @ munna and another — 96/2020

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,354(B),379,447,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 05th June 2026.

Case disposed

Spl SC/ST (POA) Act

CNR: BRSH010018982020

Filing Number

1665/2020

Filing Date

16-Aug-2020

Registration No

96/2020

Registration Date

18-Aug-2020

Court

DJ Div. Saharsa

Judge

3-District And Additional Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

05-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 16-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

23

Police Station

SC/ST

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,354(B),379,447,504,506,34
Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 3(1),(r),(s),(w)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.kranti devi

    Adv. AMRENDRA KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sandeep kumar @ munna and another

  2. 2.devendra prasad

  3. 3.Sandeep Kumar @ Munna

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    Copy of JudgmentsView PDF

    Case Summary: 96/2020 - Kranti Devi v. Sandeep Kumar @ Munna Court Decision: The Special Judge (S.C./S.T.) in Saharsa acquitted accused Sandeep Kumar @ Munna of all charges under IPC Sections 341, 323, 354, 447, 504, 506, 34 and SC/ST Act Section 3(1)(r)(s)(wii). The court found insufficient legal evidence from the prosecution to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Key Facts: Kranti Devi (petitioner/complainant) alleged that on 11.08.2020, Sandeep Kumar and others assaulted, abused, and robbed her of jewelry worth ₹25,000, using caste-based slurs. Despite prosecution examining five witnesses, three key witnesses stated they knew nothing about the incident or provided inconsistent testimony, while cross-examination revealed contradictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-I

  4. 26-May-2026

    Arguments

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-I

  5. 18-May-2026

    Arguments

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-I

  6. 15-May-2026

    Statement Us.313 Cr.p.c.

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-I

  7. 08-May-2026

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-I

  8. 02-May-2026

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-I

  9. 02-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-I

  10. 03-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-I

  11. 18-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-I

  12. 21-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-I

  13. 10-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-I

  14. 15-May-2025

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-I

  15. 20-Mar-2025

    Evidence

  16. 16-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-I

  17. 25-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-I

  18. 04-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-I

  19. 02-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-I

  20. 08-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-I

  21. 28-May-2024

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-I

  22. 15-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-I

  23. 07-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-I

  24. 09-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-I

  25. 08-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-I

  26. 26-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-I

  27. 30-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-I

  28. 28-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-I

  29. 02-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-I

  30. 01-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-III

  31. 02-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-III

  32. 22-Jun-2022

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-III

  33. 08-Apr-2022

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-III

  34. 15-Jan-2022

    Appearence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-III

  35. 30-Sep-2021

    Awaiting for Final Form Or Chargesheet

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-III

  36. 21-Jun-2021

    Awaiting for Final Form Or Chargesheet

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-III

  37. 19-Mar-2021

    Awaiting for Final Form Or Chargesheet

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-III

  38. 12-Jan-2021

    Awaiting for Final Form Or Chargesheet

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-III

  39. 15-Oct-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  40. 16-Aug-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 96/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 96/2020 - Kranti Devi v. Sandeep Kumar @ Munna Court Decision: The Special Judge (S.C./S.T.) in Saharsa acquitted accused Sandeep Kumar @ Munna of all charges under IPC Sections 341, 323, 354, 447, 504, 506, 34 and SC/ST Act Section 3(1)(r)(s)(wii). The court found insufficient legal evidence from the prosecution to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Key Facts: Kranti Devi (petitioner/complainant) alleged that on 11.08.2020, Sandeep Kumar and others assaulted, abused, and robbed her of jewelry worth ₹25,000, using caste-based slurs. Despite prosecution examining five witnesses, three key witnesses stated they knew nothing about the incident or provided inconsistent testimony, while cross-examination revealed contradictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case