ANKIT KUMAR JHA vs State of Bihar — 140/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64(1),62,3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 01st April 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRSH010017692026
e-Filing Number
26-02-2026
Filing Number
1712/2026
Filing Date
26-Feb-2026
Registration No
140/2026
Registration Date
26-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Saharsa
Judge
3-District And Additional Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 17-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
04
Police Station
Mahila
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ANKIT KUMAR JHA
Adv. SHILENDRA NARAYAN SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
The Saharsa Women Police Station case (No. 04/2026) involves charges under IPC Sections 64(1), 62, and 3(5) against two accused, Ankit Kumar Jha and Krishna Kumar. The court rejected their bail applications, finding the allegations of attempted rape sufficiently serious and supported by CCTV evidence, victim identification, and prior criminal history of one accused. The court dismissed the bail pleas and ordered the accused to remain in judicial custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Disposed
District And Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
24-Mar-2026
Hearing
District And Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
District And Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
District And Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
07-Mar-2026
Hearing
District And Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
28-Feb-2026
Hearing
District And Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
27-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 140/2026
The Saharsa Women Police Station case (No. 04/2026) involves charges under IPC Sections 64(1), 62, and 3(5) against two accused, Ankit Kumar Jha and Krishna Kumar. The court rejected their bail applications, finding the allegations of attempted rape sufficiently serious and supported by CCTV evidence, victim identification, and prior criminal history of one accused. The court dismissed the bail pleas and ordered the accused to remain in judicial custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts