HARSH KUMAR ALIAS PIYUSH KUMAR vs State of Bihar — 134/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 329(3),109(1),351(2),352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED on 06th April 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRSH010017192026
e-Filing Number
25-02-2026
Filing Number
1666/2026
Filing Date
25-Feb-2026
Registration No
134/2026
Registration Date
25-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Saharsa
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
06-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED
Last updated 17-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
101
Police Station
BASANAHI
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HARSH KUMAR ALIAS PIYUSH KUMAR
Adv. Munni Kumari
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Apr-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Saharsa granted bail to petitioner Harsh Kumar @ Piyush Kumar, who was accused under Sections 329(3), 109(1), 351(2), 352, 3(5) of BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act in connection with an alleged mango orchard incident. The court found that the petitioner had no criminal antecedent, bore no sustained injury, and a co-accused in the same case had already been granted bail, warranting similar treatment. The petitioner was released on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions under Section 480(3) of BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
-
26-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 134/2026
The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Saharsa granted bail to petitioner Harsh Kumar @ Piyush Kumar, who was accused under Sections 329(3), 109(1), 351(2), 352, 3(5) of BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act in connection with an alleged mango orchard incident. The court found that the petitioner had no criminal antecedent, bore no sustained injury, and a co-accused in the same case had already been granted bail, warranting similar treatment. The petitioner was released on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions under Section 480(3) of BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts