BIPIN PASWAN vs STATE OF BIHAR — 198/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),303(2),109,352,351(2),351(3). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED on 26th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSH010014052026
e-Filing Number
17-02-2026
Filing Number
1364/2026
Filing Date
17-Feb-2026
Registration No
198/2026
Registration Date
17-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Saharsa
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
26-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED
Last updated 28-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
214
Police Station
MAHISHI
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BIPIN PASWAN
Adv. Manoj Kumar Pawan
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-Mar-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
Case Summary: Bipin Paswan v. State of Bihar (198/2026) The court granted anticipatory bail to Bipin Paswan in connection with Mahishi P.S. Case No. 214/2025 involving charges under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 109, 352, 351(2), and 351(3) BNS. The court found the injuries were simple in nature, the victim was discharged from hospital, and allegations of mobile/cash snatching lacked witness corroboration. Paswan was directed to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and cooperate in trial. The court also criticized the informant for allegedly lodging a partly false FIR and directed police to investigate whether action should be taken against the informant for making false allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
-
28-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 198/2026
Case Summary: Bipin Paswan v. State of Bihar (198/2026) The court granted anticipatory bail to Bipin Paswan in connection with Mahishi P.S. Case No. 214/2025 involving charges under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 109, 352, 351(2), and 351(3) BNS. The court found the injuries were simple in nature, the victim was discharged from hospital, and allegations of mobile/cash snatching lacked witness corroboration. Paswan was directed to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and cooperate in trial. The court also criticized the informant for allegedly lodging a partly false FIR and directed police to investigate whether action should be taken against the informant for making false allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts