UDAY MAHTO ALIAS UDAY KUMAR MAHTO vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — 194/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),74,117(2)303(2),352,351(2),(3),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 29th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSH010014002026

e-Filing Number

17-02-2026

Filing Number

1359/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

194/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Saharsa

Judge

11-District And Additional Sessions Judge-II

Decision Date

29-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

89

Police Station

Kashnagar

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),74,117(2)303(2),352,351(2),(3),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UDAY MAHTO ALIAS UDAY KUMAR MAHTO

    Adv. ANOJ KUMAR MISHRA

  2. 2.KANT LAL MAHTO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    The District and Additional Sessions Court rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by Uday Mahto and Kantlal Mahto, finding sufficient prima facie evidence against them for serious offences including assault, robbery, and culpable homicide. The court found ample material in the case diary including statements from the informant and witnesses supporting charges that the petitioners assaulted a woman, looted cash and gold earrings, and caused injuries that ultimately resulted in one victim's death after eleven days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-II

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-II

  5. 21-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-II

  6. 17-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-II

  7. 16-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  8. 07-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  9. 26-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  10. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

  11. 28-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  12. 18-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 194/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The District and Additional Sessions Court rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by Uday Mahto and Kantlal Mahto, finding sufficient prima facie evidence against them for serious offences including assault, robbery, and culpable homicide. The court found ample material in the case diary including statements from the informant and witnesses supporting charges that the petitioners assaulted a woman, looted cash and gold earrings, and caused injuries that ultimately resulted in one victim's death after eleven days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case