SASHIDEV SAH vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — 193/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 308(5). Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 26th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSH010013912026
e-Filing Number
17-02-2026
Filing Number
1350/2026
Filing Date
17-Feb-2026
Registration No
193/2026
Registration Date
17-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Saharsa
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
26-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Last updated 17-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
199
Police Station
SALAKHUA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SASHIDEV SAH
Adv. Ranbir Jha
-
2.BADAL SAH ALIAS BADAL KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF BIHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-Mar-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
The court rejected anticipatory bail for petitioner Badal Sah, finding sufficient grounds under Section 308(4) BNS (extortion) based on the FIR allegations that he demanded ransom and threatened the informant. However, the court granted anticipatory bail to petitioner Sashidev Sah, finding no credible evidence of his involvement beyond a vague allegation, and directed his release on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to cooperation in trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
-
28-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 193/2026
The court rejected anticipatory bail for petitioner Badal Sah, finding sufficient grounds under Section 308(4) BNS (extortion) based on the FIR allegations that he demanded ransom and threatened the informant. However, the court granted anticipatory bail to petitioner Sashidev Sah, finding no credible evidence of his involvement beyond a vague allegation, and directed his release on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to cooperation in trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts