VANDANA KUMARI vs STATE OF BIHAR — 168/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,467,468,471,120B. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSH010012502026

e-Filing Number

11-02-2026

Filing Number

1215/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

168/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Saharsa

Judge

6-District And Aditional Sessions Judge-IV

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

31

Police Station

SIMRI BAKHTIARPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 420,467,468,471,120B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VANDANA KUMARI

    Adv. Nawin Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    Case 168/2026 Summary The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Vandana Kumari's anticipatory bail application in a case involving allegations of securing a contractual teacher position using a fake Intermediate Marksheet. The Bihar School Examination Board verified that her submitted marksheet showed 680 marks when her actual marks were 433, constituting document fraud under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471, and 120(B). The court found the allegations serious, reasoning that employment fraud through forged documents harms eligible candidates and society, warranting denial of bail protection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District And Aditional Sessions Judge-IV

  4. 28-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District And Aditional Sessions Judge-IV

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District And Aditional Sessions Judge-IV

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 168/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 168/2026 Summary The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Vandana Kumari's anticipatory bail application in a case involving allegations of securing a contractual teacher position using a fake Intermediate Marksheet. The Bihar School Examination Board verified that her submitted marksheet showed 680 marks when her actual marks were 433, constituting document fraud under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471, and 120(B). The court found the allegations serious, reasoning that employment fraud through forged documents harms eligible candidates and society, warranting denial of bail protection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case