RAJESH THAKUR vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — 156/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,467,468,471,120(B). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 12th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSH010012072026
e-Filing Number
09-02-2026
Filing Number
1172/2026
Filing Date
09-Feb-2026
Registration No
156/2026
Registration Date
09-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Saharsa
Judge
6-District And Aditional Sessions Judge-IV
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 28-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
22
Police Station
Balwahat
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJESH THAKUR
Adv. RAJESH KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF BIHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
Case 156/2026 Summary The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Rajesh Thakur's anticipatory bail application in a case involving alleged fraud in securing a contractual teacher position. The Bihar School Examination Board certified that Thakur's submitted Intermediate marksheet showing 570 marks was fake; his actual marks were 565. The court dismissed Thakur's claim that a 5-mark grace was universally applied as unsubstantiated and found the charge serious, noting that fraudulent employment harms eligible candidates, thus denying bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
District And Aditional Sessions Judge-IV
-
26-Feb-2026
Hearing
District And Aditional Sessions Judge-IV
-
13-Feb-2026
Hearing
District And Aditional Sessions Judge-IV
-
12-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 156/2026
Case 156/2026 Summary The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Rajesh Thakur's anticipatory bail application in a case involving alleged fraud in securing a contractual teacher position. The Bihar School Examination Board certified that Thakur's submitted Intermediate marksheet showing 570 marks was fake; his actual marks were 565. The court dismissed Thakur's claim that a 5-mark grace was universally applied as unsubstantiated and found the charge serious, noting that fraudulent employment harms eligible candidates, thus denying bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts