KANTI KUMARI vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — 155/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,467,468,471,120(B). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 12th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSH010012022026
e-Filing Number
09-02-2026
Filing Number
1167/2026
Filing Date
09-Feb-2026
Registration No
155/2026
Registration Date
09-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Saharsa
Judge
6-District And Aditional Sessions Judge-IV
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 28-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
20
Police Station
Balwahat
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KANTI KUMARI
Adv. RAJESH KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF BIHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
Case Summary: Kanti Kumari v. The State of Bihar (155/2026) The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Kanti Kumari's anticipatory bail application in a case involving alleged document fraud. The petitioner, a contractual teacher, was accused of securing employment using a fake Intermediate Marksheet showing 600 marks when the Bihar School Examination Board certified her actual marks were 595. The court rejected her defense that the 5-mark difference resulted from grace marks awarded under regulations, finding no evidentiary support for this claim. The court denied bail, emphasizing the seriousness of obtaining employment through fraudulent documents and the harm caused to eligible candidates competing fairly for positions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
District And Aditional Sessions Judge-IV
-
26-Feb-2026
Hearing
District And Aditional Sessions Judge-IV
-
13-Feb-2026
Hearing
District And Aditional Sessions Judge-IV
-
12-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 155/2026
Case Summary: Kanti Kumari v. The State of Bihar (155/2026) The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Kanti Kumari's anticipatory bail application in a case involving alleged document fraud. The petitioner, a contractual teacher, was accused of securing employment using a fake Intermediate Marksheet showing 600 marks when the Bihar School Examination Board certified her actual marks were 595. The court rejected her defense that the 5-mark difference resulted from grace marks awarded under regulations, finding no evidentiary support for this claim. The court denied bail, emphasizing the seriousness of obtaining employment through fraudulent documents and the harm caused to eligible candidates competing fairly for positions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts