MADAN THAKUR vs STATE OF BIHAR — 154/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,467,468,471,120(B). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 12th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSH010011992026
e-Filing Number
09-02-2026
Filing Number
1164/2026
Filing Date
09-Feb-2026
Registration No
154/2026
Registration Date
09-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Saharsa
Judge
6-District And Aditional Sessions Judge-IV
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 28-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
21
Police Station
Balwahat
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MADAN THAKUR
Adv. RAJESH KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
Case Summary: Madan Thakur v. State of Bihar (154/2026) The court rejected Madan Thakur's anticipatory bail application in a case involving charges of forgery and fraud. Thakur, a contractual teacher, allegedly secured his job using a fake Intermediate Marksheet showing 568 marks, while the Bihar School Examination Board certified his actual marks were 564. The court found the petitioner's explanation about grace marks unsubstantiated and accepted the Board's certification that the marksheet was fake, considering the serious nature of obtaining employment through forged documents and its harmful impact on eligible candidates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
District And Aditional Sessions Judge-IV
-
26-Feb-2026
Hearing
District And Aditional Sessions Judge-IV
-
13-Feb-2026
Hearing
District And Aditional Sessions Judge-IV
-
12-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 154/2026
Case Summary: Madan Thakur v. State of Bihar (154/2026) The court rejected Madan Thakur's anticipatory bail application in a case involving charges of forgery and fraud. Thakur, a contractual teacher, allegedly secured his job using a fake Intermediate Marksheet showing 568 marks, while the Bihar School Examination Board certified his actual marks were 564. The court found the petitioner's explanation about grace marks unsubstantiated and accepted the Board's certification that the marksheet was fake, considering the serious nature of obtaining employment through forged documents and its harmful impact on eligible candidates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts