Rajesh Kumar Yadav alias Rajesh Kumar vs state of Bihar — 142/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 292. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 26th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSH010010382026

e-Filing Number

03-02-2026

Filing Number

1010/2026

Filing Date

03-Feb-2026

Registration No

142/2026

Registration Date

03-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Saharsa

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

26-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 17-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

140

Police Station

MAHISHI

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 292
Arms Act Section 25(9),35

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajesh Kumar Yadav alias Rajesh Kumar

    Adv. Prem Nath Raman

  2. 2.Rajesh Kumar Yadav alias Rajesh kumar

    Adv. Prem Nath Raman

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.state of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Saharsa rejected Rajesh Kumar Yadav's anticipatory bail petition, finding that custodial interrogation was necessary to recover alleged countrywide pistols and rifles seen in a viral video. The court noted the petitioner has no firearm license, was identified in the video, has a criminal history including prior Arms Act violations, and the weapon used in the video was not recovered during the search of his house. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 17-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  8. 16-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  9. 05-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  10. 04-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 03-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 142/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Saharsa rejected Rajesh Kumar Yadav's anticipatory bail petition, finding that custodial interrogation was necessary to recover alleged countrywide pistols and rifles seen in a viral video. The court noted the petitioner has no firearm license, was identified in the video, has a criminal history including prior Arms Act violations, and the weapon used in the video was not recovered during the search of his house. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case